George Lakoff, a
distinguished professor at UCal Berkeley, claims in an article published today that some protestors at OWS had asked for his advice, and he waxes eloquent about
properly framing the issue--with the purported goal of prevailing in the 2012 elections.
Lakoff clearly cannot see very well from the parapet of his ivory tower.
The OWS protest has exactly jack to do with any election anywhere--except as a wholesale
rejection of that system.
See, George, we've tried elections, and regardless of whether "we" control both houses and the white house, or whether "they" do--illegal war, looting of the treasury, torture, rendition, assassination, wiretapping--all of it, not only continues unabated, but has only
gotten worse under the current regime.
But I do see your point about framing the issue. So I suggest that you, Professor George Lakoff of the University of California at Berkeley, immediately resign unless torture-memo author
Professor John Yoo--(your esteemed colleague, paid and protected by tenure by the same organization) is fired immediately. (More on Yoo's allowable torture--it includes
children's genitalia!--can be found
here and
here.)
Your trite "advice" in the article aside, the fact you have remained utterly silent on this abomination exposes you as ignorant and foolish at best--
Or complicit at worst.
Either way, your credibility takes a fatal hit.
Until you resign or Yoo does, then, shut the fuck up, eh?
In the meantime, I suggest you go down to the local #occupy gathering, and LISTEN.
I'll have more from our own Occupy Eugene later today.
Update 1:
To
the critics who've written protesting my pillorying of Prof. Lakoff,
saying, more or less, butbutbut Noam Chomsky works for MIT:
It is true that Lakoff and Chomsky have written extensively in
what is generally a progressive vein. But Chomsky went out in the
street and was
bloodied alongside Howard Zinn. Chomsky had the
fortitude to stand up and defend free speech when it was a holocaust
denier speaking, because, as he eloquently noted: "If we don't believe
in free speech for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."
Chomsky acknowledges the futility of elections and the
usurpation of the political process by corporations.
Lakoff just sucks off Democrats, wipes his mouth, and tells us the 2012 elections are
important, after
Obama proved unequivocally that Corporations rule.
As for what I've done, I don't think you want to get into a pissing
match over who is "more authentic," which seems counter-productive, but for establishing cred purposes, I have spent twenty hours since Saturday as a
legal observer for the
local occupy movement, and I'm about to head back down there.
In any event, I don't think you can argue that Lakoff has written a
syllable criticizing torture or his employer's overt support of it.
Show me where, and I'll concede the argument.
My point is that Lakoff--and a whole host of nominally progressive
writers, journalists, and teachers today--are stuck in the "Democrats
are better than Republicans" paradigm.
I also humbly submit there are times when silence equals complicity; when your coworker takes the position that, should the president
deem it necessary, he could have the
testicles of a child crushed, it is, I
think pretty goddamned obviously, one of those times.
Noam Chomsky never remained silent, knowing full well the damage he
was doing to himself professionally. Watch
"Manufacturing Consent"--it's free on the
innertubes--and it'll clarify the distinction
I make between Lakoff, who hasn't the courage of his alleged
convictions, and Chomsky, who got his head busted and sucked
Mace, and
never went easy on
MIT or the
MIC...
I hope you are helping your local Occupy movement, cause electoral politics is the show they want us to watch.
We disempower them by making them irrelevant.